“Political and Economic Might” – Is This the Definition of ‘Power’ We Want?

by | Aug 30, 2012 | Commentary, InPower Women Blog

Forbes has just published its annual list of the world’s 100 Most Powerful Women.

I applaud these women for their amazing impact and success, and I applaud Forbes for recognizing them. Yet it makes me wonder. Do Forbes’ more traditional criteria for power – “political and economic might” – seem broad enough? These are good and valid measures of power.  I just don’t think they’re broad enough, because I don’t think they help us rethink power in the ways that power needs to be rethought.

I’d like to see a list of the most powerful peacemakers; the most effective educators; the most inspiring role models; the greatest champions for those without a voice.  Whether or not you will ever hear about them, these are women of power as well. Forbes won’t be heralding them, but someone should. Over the coming months, I’ll be working with InPower Women to establish an annual award to recognize women who demonstrate an expanded, more current form of power: measured not by the size of title or income, but rather by the quality of their impact and character.  Stay tuned!

Guest Author

Guest Author

AI vs. Human Intuition: Becoming the Stewards of Meaning

AI vs. Human Intuition: Becoming the Stewards of Meaning

My feeds are full of some version of the question, "What will humans do when AI does all our thinking for us?” Considering the perspectives I hear in this debate, I think the answer is that humans will learn to develop and rely on their intuition much more than we do...

Executive Job Search Strategies 2026: A Guide for Senior Leaders

Executive Job Search Strategies 2026: A Guide for Senior Leaders

AI Job Search: More Human Than Ever In case you blinked, the new landscape of executive job search strategies in 2026 has shifted thanks to artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the confusion, one thing is clear: you are now competing in an AI-heavy job market. For...

Coaching Resources