October 2025 Leadership Development Carnival

It’s time for another installment of the Leadership Development Carnival! Thanks to Weaving Influence and the Lead Change for organizing some great posts from some remarkable leadership writers.

If you’re new to blog Carnivals, these represent a collection of posts from a variety of writers, organized by major themes and presented for your professional and inspirational pleasure.

*****************

Communication

5 Stages of Distrust and How It Destroys Your Relationships by Randy Conley LinkedIn

In this article, Randy shares that distrust doesn’t happen overnight. It develops progressively through stages, and if we can recognize these stages when we’re in them, we have a chance of addressing the situation before distrust takes root.

Why Hope Might Be the Most Powerful Leadership Strategy of All by Julie Winkle Giulioni LinkedIn

Hope isn’t fluffy—it’s fuel for performance, resilience, and retention according to Julie Winkle Giulioni who explains why hope actually is a strategy in today’s workplace.

5 Signs of Leadership Hubris: Are You a Leader or a Ruler? by Bill Treasurer LinkedIn

We’ve all worked for a horrible boss—and the scars they leave can last a lifetime. Find the five warning signs of leadership hubris, the dangerous overconfidence that turns leaders into rulers. Use these insights to reflect on your own leadership and ensure you’re empowering rather than intimidating.

Are Your Words Derailing Your Conversation? by John Stoker LinkedIn

We all have said some stupid things at times. The challenge is to learn and improve as we go. Taking the time to consider how you will say or deliver an important message is well worth the effort. Here are some suggestions for you to consider to improve the quality of your most difficult conversations.

Can “You” Be a Fighting Word? Try Owning it With an “I” Statement by Diana Peterson-More LinkedIn

The Supreme Court gave us a definition of a “fighting word,” in a 1942 case: “words tending to incite violence.” Can the use of the word “you” qualify? This post answers that question with examples of how one can turn “you” into a fighting word, and, more importantly, tips on how to ensure that doesn’t happen.

[New Study] Why Most Transformations Fail – And How to Get Change Right by David Grossman LinkedIn

Too many transformations aren’t successful: 1 in 4 fail outright, driving burnout, disengagement, and turnover. I’ve seen firsthand how today’s pace of change overwhelms employees’ capacity to absorb it. Our new national study with The Harris Poll reveals what sets successful transformations apart – and what leaders and communicators can do differently to unlock stronger performance.

Creativity/Inspiration

Side Gigs as a Path to Purpose, Growth and Motivation by Jillian Miles Massey LinkedIn

The truth is that some people simply need more than one role to feel whole. A single job, no matter how good, may never meet their need for autonomy, mastery and purpose. Side gigs are not just “extra work” for them. They are the work that makes life feel meaningful.

Development

The End of Humans Exclusively Managing Humans? by Kevin Oakes LinkedIn

The next frontier in leadership development will focus not only on teaching leaders how to leverage AI agents to perform complete tasks and roles, but also on how to effectively integrate agents into existing team structures.

Mirror, Mirror: What Does Your Image Say About You? by Frank Sonnenberg LinkedIn

With so much riding on it, when was the last time you seriously considered your image — instead of assuming it would take care of itself?

What’s Your Pace? by Priscilla Archangel LinkedIn

We all have a variety of “marathons” to complete in our life and work. It’s that stretch goal that’s more difficult or complex than anything we’ve attempted in the past. It may take more effort than we imagine or greater capabilities than we possess. It will require a lot of preparation and work. And we must determine the right pace to reach the goal.

How to prepare your organization for possible futures? by Marcella Bremer LinkedIn

How to prepare your organization for possible futures? Research discerns four organizational strategies to enhance resilience, from defensive to progressive. These strategies align with organizational culture types. How does your small to medium-sized business prepare for the future?

Nobody cares about work culture until it fails by S Chris Edmonds LinkedIn

Creating a good work culture means defining and measuring it to ensure it’s aligned with values, strategies and goals.

Engagement

Keep your star employee from jumping ship by Robyn McLeod LinkedIn

Robyn McLeod of Thoughtful Leaders™ Blog presents Keep your star employee from jumping ship where she offers actionable strategies to engage, challenge, and reward your top performers. By helping high performers recognize the value of staying, you can retain their contributions and avoid the costly risk of losing your best employees.

How to Effectively Bridge the Gap With Next-Gen Talent by Jon Lokhorst LinkedIn

For today’s leaders, bridging the generational divide isn’t optional—it’s essential for building resilient, forward-thinking organizations. With highlights from a 23-year global research study, explore powerful insights into how this generation is reshaping the ways organizations engage, develop, and retain Gen Z employees.

Process Discipline

Simplify to Amplify – The Power of Process Discipline by Jon Verbeck LinkedIn

Process improvement isn’t about adding more — it’s about distilling complexity into clarity. That kind of simplicity isn’t accidental. When we help clients optimize operations, we begin by mapping core process cycles.

Productivity

Mastering Reverse Goal Setting by Eileen McDargh, CSP, CPAE LinkedIn

Setting goals can feel impossible—we simply don’t know what we want. That’s why I use reverse goal setting. Instead of starting with what you want, begin with what you don’t want.

Stop Paying the Referee Tax by Bill Ringle LinkedIn

You hired senior managers to run the business, yet you’re mediating their turf wars daily. Welcome to the 200-employee wall, where potentially great tech companies die. While competitors ship faster, you’re stuck playing referee. Decision Charters and Conflict Resolution Ladders transform your managers from politicians into owners in 30 days. Stop managing managers. Start scaling execution. Your board watches for shifts like this.

Team Building

The 3 Essential Behaviors That Build Trust and Drive Team Productivity by Sean Glaze LinkedIn

Building and sustaining trust requires more than good intentions—it demands deliberate actions and consistent behavior. There are three key behaviors that leaders and team members can practice to cultivate trust and unleash their team’s full potential.

Check out our previously hosted Leadership Carnivals for even more great insights and tips!

FREE

Confidential Access: InPower AI Coach

PLUS: 3 AI Coaching best practices, 10 Use Cases, and 62+ AI Prompts to make you better at working with humans [PDF Download]

The Mute Button on Your Ego: How Active Listening Builds Respect

The Underrated Leadership Skill: How Active Listening Builds Respect and Power

Active listening skills are a communication hack for all kinds of professional and personal situations. It is one of the most effective skills a leader can develop to improve their emotional intelligence and soft skills exponentially. Active listening techniques are also simple and easy ways to improve personal relationships through everyday interactions. Miscommunications often stem from a lack of conscious effort, engaged body language, and clarifying questions. Active listening directly addresses all this and more by building the foundation of all healthy human dynamics: respect. When you make someone feel truly heard, you give them a powerful sense of respect that encourages them to trust you. And–bonus!–you gain more information and buy-in to help your problem solving with a deeper understanding of the issues that can build stronger relationships.

Key Takeaways

  •  Distinguish between hearing and understanding: active listening focuses on comprehension, not immediate agreement.
  •  Practice the three pillars of active listening: listen without judgment, summarize in your own words to verify, and only then share your perspective.
  •  Boost key metrics: studies show active listening can improve employee satisfaction by 30% and team collaboration by 25%.
  •  Close the “voice gap” for women and underrepresented groups, fostering psychological safety and belonging.
  •  Start practicing today: dedicate the first five minutes of every conversation to asking curious, non-leading questions.

Photo by Felicity Tai

Why Active Listening is More Than Just Hearing

Many leaders mistakenly believe that understanding someone implies agreement, so they actively resist active listening! This is a fundamental error in communication and leadership both. The core principle of active listening is separating the act of understanding from the act of forming a judgment. Its purpose is to ensure you have accurately received the information, thoughts, and feelings another person is trying to convey before you move on to deciding what to do and taking action.

Why bother becoming a better listener and investing yourself in the communication process that leads to a better understanding? Effective communication isn’t just about saying what you want to say–a one-way process–it includes ensuring the other person is willing to participate in open communication with you, which means they’re willing to deploy their own listening skills, opening themselves to be influenced by you. And what better way to encourage them to hear you than to pay attention to what they say as well?

The human need to feel respected is profound. A primary way we experience respect is by feeling heard. This simple, yet powerful, act validates a person’s perspective and humanity, and it doesn’t even require that you come to a mutual understanding. When you actively listen, you signal that you value the speaker themselves. You can validate the person’s feelings without agreeing with them simply by demonstrating you care enough to give them your undivided attention. This doesn’t mean you will ultimately agree with them at all. It means you are giving their viewpoint the consideration it deserves before you decide how to respond or provide feedback. This distinction between hearing and listening (to understand) is the key that unlocks a more advanced level of communication and influence.

How To Be An Active Listener: The Three Pillars

Active listening is not passive listening. It is a structured, three-part communications technique that requires your full engagement.

  1. Listen Without Judgment: The first step involves listening with curiosity. Quiet your own mind. Reserve judgment. Consciously set aside your internal distractions, your opinions, your counterarguments, and your solutions. Your only goal at first is to absorb what the other person is saying, both verbally and non-verbally. Pay attention to facial expressions, observe body language, and notice nonverbal cues. Ask many, many questions seeking clarification. This can be difficult, especially when you hear something that triggers an emotional response. However, reserving judgment is critical. You cannot truly understand someone if your mind is busy formulating a reply. This stage is about pure curiosity. To enhance the affect of your listening, practice positive body language, eye contact, and repeating the speaker’s key points in your questions. You’re providing value simply by being a sounding board.
  2. Verify Your Understanding: Once you believe you have a grasp of their message, the next step is to reflect it back to the person speaking in your own words. You can start with a simple phrase like, “So, what I’m hearing you say is…” or “It sounds like you’re feeling…” Putting their ideas into your own words helps you take on the speaker’s perspective by processing what you heard. This ensures you understand the speaker’s intent and can help you validate the speaker’s feelings (whether you share them or not). Don’t just parrot the speaker’s words back to them. Often, when people hear their own thoughts articulated by someone else, it helps them clarify their thinking. They might realize they were unclear or that their initial statement was incomplete. This exchange allows for a deeper level of communication and better understanding.
  3. Respond with Your Perspective: Only after the other person confirms that you have understood them correctly should you share your own thoughts. Because you have invested the time to fully listen, you may find your initial reaction has changed. You might need a moment to consider your response, and it is perfectly acceptable to say, “Thank you for sharing that. I need some time to think about it.” When you do respond, the other person is far more likely to listen openly to you because you have already offered them that same courtesy.

The Business Case: Why Active Listening Drives Results

This isn’t just about being a “nice” leader. Active listening is more than empathic listening and has a measurable impact on business outcomes. As much as 80% of all workplace conflict results from poor communications. Interpersonal skills like active listening can improve employee satisfaction by as much as 30%, and team collaboration and productivity see a 25% boost. Employees who feel heard are more engaged, more motivated, and more likely to trust their leaders. Active listening also helps overcome language barriers. One study in the Australian Family Physician even discovered that doctors who use active listening skills were able to decrease litigation complaints!

When you practice active listening, you create a culture of psychological safety, where team members feel secure enough to share ideas, raise concerns, and admit mistakes without fear of retribution. Not only do people feel better when you use effective communication techniques like active listening, but they also contribute more. The safety to contribute is the bedrock of innovation and high performance. When you listen actively, you are not just improving a relationship; active listening techniques ensure you are building a more resilient and effective team capable of producing more meaningful business outcomes.

Here’s a case in point. I can’t tell you how many of my clients begin experimenting with active listening and come back quickly to tell me how fast it improved their relations with all kinds of people. Many have told me that–to their surprise–by merely setting aside judgment and asking good questions:

  • other people have come up with better solutions than they did
  • contentious relationships have become more productive
  • they’ve helped people think more deeply about the issues without having to suggest solutions or “do the thinking for them”
  • they’ve learned things about the person’s point of view they had been unaware of
  • they’ve improved their own ideas
  • they’ve improved their critical and empathic listening skills
  • they’ve noticed that others responded differently than they thought they would, helping them understand misplaced assumptions they’d made before the conversation

A Tool for Inclusive Leadership

For women in leadership and other underrepresented leaders, active listening is a key component in establishing trust and gaining influence. Many underrepresented groups often report feeling unheard or having their ideas dismissed, a phenomenon sometimes called the “voice gap”. This experience is not just frustrating; it is a systemic barrier that affects the entire organization, stifles talent and drives people away, contributing to employee turnover.

By deliberately practicing active listening, you can counteract this dynamic and create positive impact. Active listening skills can ensure that every voice in the room has a chance to be fully heard and considered. You model a form of leadership that values diverse perspectives, which is essential for smart decision-making. You demonstrate that power can be used to elevate others, building a culture where people feel seen, valued, and empowered to contribute their best work. This is how you build true followership and loyalty.

Your Active Listening Practice Plan

Like any skill, active listening requires practice. It may feel awkward at first, but with persistence, it will become a natural part of your communication style. Here is a simple way to begin.

For one week, commit to starting every conversation with three to five minutes of questioning throughout your everyday life. This applies to everyone: your boss, your employees, your peers, and your family. During this time, your primary task is to remain curious. Do not agree, disagree, judge, advise, or offer opinions. Just maintain eye contact, be fully present, and ask open-ended questions to understand the other person’s world more completely. This exercise trains your brain to quiet its own agenda and focus on another person. Once you become comfortable with asking good questions, you can move on to practicing the “verify” step more proactively.

A Priceless Gift

The benefits of active listening are many. Active listening helps leaders (and anyone) in personal and professional contexts:

  • face challenges with engaging employees, managing conflict, and navigating change
  • create safe space for both sensitive subjects and difficult conversations
  • resolving conflicts before they become intractable

Giving someone your full, undivided attention is a rare and precious gift. When you actively listen, you communicate respect on a level that words alone cannot achieve. It is the simplest, most cost-effective way to build goodwill, strengthen relationships, and resolve conflict. By mastering this single skill, you will not only become a more effective leader but also enrich every interaction in your life.

If you are ready to build the social skills, interpersonal skills, and communication skills that will elevate your leadership and expand your power, consider the resources and coaching available at InPower Coaching. We can help you transform your approach to leadership and achieve your highest potential.

Ready to invest in yourself?

FREE Executive Coaching consultation with Dana Theus

Every Leadership Vision is a Change Management Vision

Key Takeaways for Leaders

  • Vision isn’t a prediction, it’s a direction: Stop trying to predict the future. Instead, use your leadership vision to intentionally guide your team away from the status quo and towards a better, shared future. It’s about aligning everyone toward a common destination, not knowing every twist and turn on the path.
  • Welcome resistance as a valuable resource: Don’t shut down or “manage” resistance; welcome it. People who push back often have legitimate concerns or valuable insights that can strengthen your vision and approach. Create safe spaces for dialogue and use their input to refine your plans and build stronger buy-in.
  • Active listening is your most powerful tool: To truly lead change, you must actively listen. This means engaging with powerful questions to understand others’ perspectives, emotions, and underlying needs, even if you don’t agree. When people feel heard, even if not agreed with, they feel respected and are far more likely to engage and support the change.
  • Communicate for connection, not just information: Once you’ve listened, communicate your vision influentially. This isn’t just about sharing information; it’s about connecting your vision to what your team members and stakeholders care about—their values, aspirations, and concerns. Show them “what’s in it for them” to foster authentic connection and shared purpose.

The Role of Vision in Leading Change and Change Management

Many leaders I know shy away from visioning because it is in art, not a science. They don’t always understand the role of visioning in guiding a team towards successful change management, and this misunderstanding leaves them vulnerable to changes knocking them off course and confusing their people. I want to help leaders everywhere reclaim the art of visioning and own it as one of their core responsibilities in leading and managing change.

If you get anxious when thinking about creating a vision, you may be falling prey to a misguided understanding of what vision is and how it can be used to drive and inspire change. Many people mistakenly believe that creating a vision means predicting the future. Visioning is about going in the right direction, but the key here is the word “direction,” more than the word “right.” Visioning isn’t about “being right” or “knowing” what will happen; it’s about creating the change that will make what you want to happen more likely to come into being. It’s about intentionally moving people away from the status quo and towards a picture of the future that is in everyone’s long-term interests.

This is the key misunderstanding. Leadership vision is not about forecasting what will happen. It is a tool the leader uses. A powerful vision offers employees and key stakeholders a visualization of a point on the horizon where things are different and better. Visualizing that destination aligns people who can form a guiding coalition. It motivates them to let go of old habits. It gives an intuitive guide for decision-making. It helps them band together with a common purpose and a common end goal to navigate the path ahead. By comparison, without such an aligned understanding of the endpoint, it’s all too common for the team to look like a caravan breaking up to wander randomly on all sides of the path.

Leadership isn’t about picking the right point on the horizon; it’s about guiding people on the journey and adjusting along the way. Leaders must allow themselves to envision new destinations or develop alternate routes when circumstances change. 

The Intertwined Dance of Vision and Change

Many words have been spent trying to understand the difference between leadership and management. They are so connected it’s not always clear, but when it comes to change, things do get simpler. “Change leadership” establishes the direction and guides people along the journey with decision-making, strategy, obstacle removal, and focus. “Change management” offers a complementary tool set, providing a more structured approach to navigating obstacles, ensuring that no one falls behind, tracking progress, and maintaining the schedule.

The leader’s clear vision acts as a guiding star, providing direction and purpose during times of uncertainty. It inspires people and helps them understand where the organization is going and why the change is necessary. Without this, change efforts can feel chaotic and purposeless, leading to confusion and disengagement. As leaders, our ability to articulate a powerful vision is a critical tool for gaining buy-in and inspiring collective action. Think about it: when have you felt most empowered to lead? Wasn’t it when you had a clear sense of purpose, a destination you believed in?

However, a vision alone is insufficient. Once the destination is set, the journey of change begins. This is where change management becomes important. It’s the practical application of strategies and processes to help individuals and the organization transition from the current state to the desired future state. This involves managing the human side of change, addressing concerns, building alignment, and ensuring that the new ways of working are adopted and sustained. This is often where emotionally intelligent leaders excel, leveraging communication skills to navigate complex processes, including human dynamics.

But here’s where people get stuck. They lay out a vision and immediately encounter resistance to the change they describe. Just as many leaders have misconceptions about visioning, they also undervalue resistance. Let’s unpack the art of how managing resistance can help others embrace change.

Welcoming Resistance: A Source of Insight

One of the most common mistakes leaders make is to view resistance to change as something to be “managed” or, worse, quashed. But what if resistance isn’t a roadblock, but a detour sign pointing to valuable information? The people who push back against your plan often have legitimate concerns and insights that can strengthen your vision and your approach.

The trick is not to become a leader who resists those who resist organizational change. Instead of resisting resistance, learn to welcome it. Create psychologically safe spaces for open dialogue where concerns can be aired without fear of reprisal. Those who question your plan can become your greatest allies if you genuinely listen and integrate their valid points. This doesn’t mean abandoning your vision, but rather refining it to make it more robust and inclusive. Think of it this way: does their pushback diminish your power, or does it offer an opportunity to build stronger, more resilient alignment and buy-in? When you welcome their resistance, for purposes of learning more about it and how to address it, you build your power by gaining their buy-in.

I’ve had many clients who come to me after understanding this key point, sharing stories of how they adapted their change process to address people’s concerns and had the change move forward more smoothly. Their major learning was that, while some people were just being obstreperous, they were the minority. The majority of “change resisters” simply had good ideas based on a deeper understanding of the situation’s details. My clients who listened to these employees, culling out the essential information behind the resistance and adapting their plans to address it, reported much greater success in creating change.

Most of us think we’re listening when we share our vision and solicit others’ thoughts. But too many of us are not actually listening in the way that builds trust and facilitates change.

Active Listening: The Key to Unlocking Trust

It’s challenging not to become defensive when faced with resistance, especially when you’ve poured your heart and soul into crafting a vision that excites you. This is where active listening becomes an indispensable leadership skill. Active listening isn’t about passively hearing words; it’s about engaging with powerful questions and dialogue to gain a deep understanding of the speaker’s perspective, emotions, and underlying needs. Note that just because you understand it does not mean you have to agree with it.

It requires reserving judgment long enough to hear the parts of their message that hold value and inform your change effort. When you can validate someone’s concerns, even if you disagree with their entire stance, you build trust. This trust is the bedrock upon which successful change is built. It can engage people in the change process in ways that top-down directives never will.

An anecdote might be helpful here. I once conducted a training session with a group of engineers from a major transportation company. One of the engineers complained that every change management process he’d ever been involved with was bunk. It was easy to see why he felt this way after observing him interact with others in the workshop. There was his way, and his way. He was the picture of a business leader who resisted the resisters of change. He had no interest in aligning with the people around him or anyone else in the entire organization. And the odd part was, he justified his behavior as being in alignment with the organization’s core values (e.g., in pursuit of quality.)

After an exercise in Active Listening, he made no comments, even as the rest of the room became excited about how this new skill could help them engage stakeholders, integrate emotional appeals into their change management process, and even secure some short-term wins with specific individuals. However, when we returned the following week for another workshop, the same engineer stood up and declared to the room that Active Listening had changed the way he planned to lead change going forward. He told us stories about the events that’d occurred in the last week, detailing how he’d learned why his team wasn’t meeting their key performance indicators and why he wasn’t getting on the same page with his supervisor. He literally said he was a changed man because he realized he hadn’t been listening to the information people had been trying to give him. My takeaway from this man’s experience, as well as many other testimonials I’ve heard from clients who genuinely work to shift their communication behaviors to internalize the deeper connections and alignment that active listening makes possible, is that if there is one single leadership behavior to master, this is it.

Why is Active Listening so powerful? Think about it. How often have you felt truly heard in a professional setting, and how did that impact your willingness to contribute? The answer is probably a lot. When people feel heard, even if they don’t feel agreed with, they feel respected and are more likely to engage, offer support, and live with the outcome. When you actively listen to people, they feel heard.

The Art of Influential Communications: Connecting to What Matters

Once you’ve spent time listening to people and bringing other business leaders into the conversation to enroll them in a change vision co-created through this process, it’s time to put pressure on the status quo. You move into implementing change by communicating the vision to a broader audience in a way that reflects the listening and discussion sessions that helped enroll key stakeholders. When you share the change management vision, the vision serves to motivate people to take part in leading change themselves. And you keep listening for purposes of refining and fine-tuning your plans (and also the way you communicate about them.) This is the art of influential communication. It’s not just about transmitting information; it’s about understanding what people care about and connecting your vision to their values, aspirations, and concerns.

As leaders, it’s essential to bring a holistic perspective to the table when communicating, one that includes the organization’s goals and the needs of those we aim to help. This helps us frame our vision in a way that answers the “what’s in it for me?” question for various stakeholders. It helps them see the connection between what they care about and what we, as a leader, are striving to achieve. It helps focus people on a common goal. When people see that their needs and values are acknowledged and aligned with the broader vision, they are far more likely to participate constructively and enthusiastically. This is not manipulation; it is an authentic connection and shared purpose.

I can’t tell you how many of my clients report that they’ve found it easy to influence people they’ve taken the time to hear through active listening. Don’t know what people care about? Ask them!

The Continuous Journey

Crafting a good vision and compelling change process are not one-time events. They are ongoing processes that require adaptability, resilience, and a deep understanding of human dynamics. The path will rarely be straight, and new information will always emerge. The most effective leaders are those who can adjust the sails without losing sight of the shore.

These three elements – welcoming resistance, active listening, and influential communication – are foundational. Mastering them will give you a distinct advantage in making successful organizational change a reality, leading successful change initiatives, and fostering an environment where everyone feels empowered to contribute to the shared vision.


The ability to create a clear and compelling vision, coupled with the skill to manage the resulting change effectively, is fundamental to impactful leadership. At InPower Coaching, we work with leaders and leadership teams to develop these critical skills, helping you articulate your change management vision and inspire and guide your team members through the complexities of change. If you’re ready to enhance your ability to lead transformative change and activate your highest potential, let’s connect.

Ready to invest in yourself?

FREE Executive Coaching consultation with Dana Theus

Employee Engagement Hack: Why Empowerment is More Than a Buzzword

Employee empowerment is a powerful strategy for cutting to the core of the challenges associated with employee engagement, particularly employee retention and development. Want to achieve organizational effectiveness and foster a thriving workplace? Learn to empower your employees. It can be that simple.

Why is empowerment a great hack? Empowerment is a one-stop shop solution to building trust, growing skills, and generating solution-seeking innovation and creativity. When employees feel empowered, they are more likely to be engaged, proactive, and committed to the organization’s success. And, bonus! Empowerment not only maximizes the skills within your team but also frees you up to focus on strategic priorities.

Why doesn’t everyone do it? Empowerment delivers great benefits because it’s a subtle art requiring advanced leadership skills. But let’s be honest: empowering others by transferring authority runs counter to some of our base human nature coding. In our deepest psychology, people associate hierarchical power with security and safety. Want to be a great leader? Become a master at empowering others.

Key Takeaways

  • Empowerment is more than a buzzword; it’s a “one-stop shop solution” for engagement, growth, and innovation.
  • Truly empowering employees requires shifting from controlling “how” to defining “what” (and “why”) and then trusting your team.
  • Transferring authority with clear “guardrails” reduces anxiety and sets employees up for success.
  • Accountability through coaching, not micromanaging, is key to developing empowered, autonomous, and high-performing teams.
  • Mastering empowerment is a leadership superpower that unlocks human potential and drives organizational success.
  • Empowerment fuels employee engagement by fostering autonomy, purpose, and growth—key drivers of motivation and long-term retention.

The Business Case for Employee Empowerment

As leaders, understanding the mechanics of empowerment is crucial. It’s not just a “nice-to-have”; it’s a strategic imperative. My experience coaching senior executives has shown me time and again that those who effectively empower their teams not only see better results but also cultivate a more resilient and forward-thinking organizational culture. They engage their employees to bring more value to the team, at the same time, they can reduce their own workload and stress. There are so many benefits to incorporating empowerment strategies into your leadership and management style.

Empowerment is Efficient

Empowerment is more than delegation; it’s a strategic use of resources. When you transfer goals and tasks that do not require your efforts, this helps you maximize your skillset and make room for your development. It offers you the opportunity to focus on the tasks that truly require your unique expertise and perspective. By moving work off your plate that does not have to be done by you, you are not just offloading work; you are strategically utilizing the business’s investment in its people. This leads to greater overall team productivity. As a leader, this also gives you more time to “manage up” – to engage with senior leadership, strategize, and advocate for your team and your initiatives. Many leaders I coach find that learning to empower their teams is a critical step in freeing up their own capacity for higher-level strategic work.

Photo by Kindel Media

Empowerment is Motivating

Human beings have an innate desire to learn, grow, and contribute meaningfully. Enabling these core motivations is a key requirement of employee engagement. Growing and contributing employees are, by definition, engaged! When you empower your employees, you provide them with the autonomy that is a key driver of intrinsic motivation, which directly contributes to employee engagement. They are more likely to take initiative, seek out new skills, and invest themselves more deeply in their work. As a leader, fostering an environment where team members feel this sense of ownership can be particularly impactful in encouraging diverse talents to flourish. Research shows that empowered employees exhibit higher levels of engagement, with some studies indicating they are in the 79th percentile for engagement.

Have you ever read the book Drive by Dan Pink? It’s a brilliant way to think about motivation for knowledge workers. Here’s a short explainer but the book is full of interesting research you’d also enjoy reading.

INSERT VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc

Empowerment is Innovative

No matter how brilliant or experienced you are, you don’t have a monopoly on good ideas. Empowering your employees unlocks a wealth of diverse perspectives and creative solutions. Your team members, especially those closer to the day-to-day operations or the customer, often have unique insights. By encouraging them to contribute their ideas and take initiative, you can generate a far greater variety of innovative solutions than you could on your own. With your guidance, you can then shape your team’s broader set of ideas into impactful strategies. Companies with empowered employees often see greater innovation output.

The Hurdles: Why Empowerment Can Be Hard Work

Simply wanting to empower your team isn’t enough to make it happen. Just because you think you’ve empowered someone doesn’t mean they feel empowered, or behavior that way. It’s an art, not a science, and several factors can get in the way. Recognizing these challenges is the first step to overcoming them.

Control (Yours)

Letting go of a bit of your authority and accountability to the outcome can be difficult. As leaders, we often feel a strong sense of responsibility for results and quality, which can translate into a desire to maintain tight control. This is a common challenge I see in coaching, especially for women who have had to fight for their authority and often achieve it with meticulous attention to detail. However, this instinct can lead you to withhold the very resources, information, or decision-making power your employees need to succeed. True empowerment requires a shift from controlling the “how” to defining the “what” and trusting and coaching your team to deliver.

Anxiety (Yours and Theirs)

Empowerment involves a degree of uncertainty, and uncertainty can breed anxiety. Your employees may feel anxious about taking on new responsibilities, making decisions, or potentially failing. They might worry, wondering if they’re “doing it right.” Simultaneously, you might feel anxious about whether they’ll meet deadlines, maintain quality, or make mistakes that reflect on you. Acknowledging these anxieties, both your own and your team’s, is crucial for creating a supportive environment where growth can happen. Luckily, you have a tool to manage anxiety, which is to check in with them often and coach them through the work.

Inexperience (Yours and Theirs)

When you use empowering leadership, your employees will find themselves in their stretch zone more often. And if they haven’t been empowered before, they might lack the experience to navigate their new autonomy effectively. Similarly, if you’re new to empowering others, you might not do it perfectly from the start. In short, there’s a learning curve for everyone involved. This is where patience, clear communication, and a coaching leadership style become invaluable.

Mastering the Art: How to Empower Employees

While empowering your employees is more art than science, there are practical steps you can take to cultivate this skill. If you google empowerment, you’ll find a lot of advice about building a psychologically safe and trusting environment, clear communications, and recognition and appreciation. These are important factors for any employee engagement strategy, but by themselves, they’re not enough to empower people. Below are the key management strategies I often teach to my executive coaching clients to help them build high-performing, autonomous teams. And don’t fall prey to the idea that every goal is empowerment-worthy. The outcomes need to be conducive to making these steps possible, or else you’ll need another approach. But when the tasks are right, here’s how to do employee empowerment.

1. Learn to Set Empowering Goals

The foundation of effective empowerment lies in how you define success. Shift from prescribing the process to clarifying the desired outcome. This opens up room for your employees to engage their creativity and teamwork to find a great solution.

  • Focus on the “what,” not the “how”: Clearly articulate the objective, the standards of quality, and any critical constraints. But then, give your employees the space to figure out the best way to achieve that outcome. This allows them to bring their own skills, creativity, and problem-solving abilities to the forefront.
  • Make it meaningful with a compelling “why”: Connect the goal to the bigger picture. Help your employees understand why this task matters to the team, the department, or the organization. This sense of purpose is a powerful motivator and gives them guidance when they get lost.

2. Transfer Authority (with Guardrails)

Empowerment without authority is an empty gesture. Why do you think your team will be successful in getting results if they don’t have the appropriate power to make it happen? To truly empower someone, you must delegate some of your decision-making power and provide access to necessary resources.

  • Grant necessary credibility and resources: This might mean allowing them to make certain decisions independently (which you’ll back up), manage a budget, or represent the team in specific contexts.
  • Establish clear guardrails: This is critical. Define the boundaries of their authority. What decisions can they make on their own? When do they need to consult you? What are the limits on the resources they can use? Does their authority expire at some point? Providing these guardrails doesn’t undermine empowerment; it provides a framework for success and reduces anxiety for both you and your employee. It ensures they have what they need and are guided in using it wisely. Think of it as setting up the “rules of the game” so they can play effectively and confidently.

3. Maintain Accountability Through Coaching (Not Micromanaging)

Empowerment doesn’t mean abdicating responsibility or waiting until the last minute to see if things are on track. It means shifting your role from director to coach.

  • Schedule regular check-ins: These are not status updates where you dictate next steps. Instead, use this time to listen to their plans and progress, offer help when they’re stuck, and recognition when they’re doing well. It’s the “employee engagement” part of employee empowerment. 
  • Ask probing questions: Encourage critical thinking by asking questions like, “What are your thoughts on how to approach this?” “What potential challenges do you foresee?” “What resources do you need?” This helps them develop their problem-solving skills and allows you to gauge their thinking.
  • Reinforce priority and offer support: Remind them that the project is important and that you are there to support them, not to take over. This builds their confidence and ensures they feel you have their back. This approach to accountability fosters their growth and helps you ensure that empowered actions align with strategic objectives.

Last but not least, give them credit for a job well done. 

Empowerment as a Leadership Superpower

Employee empowerment is far more than a management technique; it’s a leadership philosophy that unlocks human potential and drives organizational success. Mastering the art of empowerment can be a particularly potent leadership tool for building inclusive, innovative, and high-achieving teams. It allows you to amplify your impact, develop future leaders, and create a work environment where everyone can thrive. While it may require conscious effort to overcome ingrained habits of control, attention to detail, and anxiety that come with delegation, the rewards, in terms of efficiency, motivation, and innovation, are immense.If you’re looking to develop your ability to empower your team, enhance your leadership impact, and boost employee engagement, consider how executive coaching or leadership team development can support you to help you master this essential skill.

You made it! Now what? Multiply your impact and not your stress.

FREE Executive Coach consultation with Dana Theus

Managing a Polarized Workforce Without Abandoning Your Principles

Key Takeaways

  • Successfully managing a polarized workforce–including deciding whether to take public stances–requires a crucial mindset shift: move away from trying to align personal beliefs and instead focus on aligning teams around shared professional objectives and the organization’s overarching goals.
  • To effectively navigate polarization, establish and consistently uphold clear ground rules for respectful, work-focused communication. Redirect conversations that become personal or unproductive back to business objectives and data.
  • Prioritize active listening to understand different perspectives without necessarily agreeing with them. Employ strategies like “sorting for agreement” to identify common ground and narrow disagreements related to work.
  • Leaders managing disagreements of any kind should model the desired behaviors: remain calm, respectful, and focused on inclusive processes. Your authenticity as a leader stems from the consistency between your actions and stated organizational values, not necessarily the public expression of personal opinions.
  • Focus on fostering a psychologically safe environment for professional collaboration. Effectively managing a polarized workforce also means knowing when and how to intervene in unproductive conflicts and, equally importantly, recognizing when certain polarizing conversations are not appropriate for the workplace. 

Workplace dynamics feel different lately, don’t they? Divisions that once seemed confined to news headlines or social media feeds are now palpable in our meetings, impacting collaboration and strategy. Suddenly, “managing a polarized workforce” feels like a skill most leaders should possess, but many of us don’t because, for so long, it’s been widely accepted that “politics and religion” don’t belong at the office. But today, many of us find ourselves working with teams where deeply held, often conflicting, political and cultural values create friction. Many leaders are discovering that their go-to conflict management style doesn’t work in today’s situation.

Fortunately, workplaces are one of the few remaining spaces where finding common ground across these divides isn’t just ideal, it’s necessary for success. As leaders, especially as women leaders navigating complex expectations such as unconscious bias, we must unite teams toward shared goals without silencing ourselves or compromising the principles that guide us. The good news is that difficult topics that tend to polarize people are also good opportunities for leaders to hone their personal skills and personal power to create leadership impact. And this doesn’t have to look like “winning” the debate, but steering the debate to build connections between people to strengthen the business.

Understanding the New Terrain: Tinderbox and Different Realities

Managing the polarization we see among our teams isn’t just background noise; it actively shapes our work environment in distinct ways. You might recognize the “Tinderbox” scenario: team members are so personally divided that conflict flares easily, making agreement difficult even on straightforward business issues. Without intentional intervention, past trust erodes, replaced by suspicion, turning simple business disagreements into proxy battles over larger values. In these circumstances, conversations can feel like walking on eggshells, often because people assume that conflict of any kind is bad. In fact, that’s a myth. Conflict can be healthy.

Then there’s the “Different Realities” problem. When fundamental views about moral imperatives and the world’s direction diverge sharply. How do you build consensus on strategic planning assumptions when there’s fundamental disagreement on the current situation and what’s most likely to happen? Based on entirely different interpretations of current events, one person sees ethical challenges where another sees ethical clarity; one person sees opportunity where another sees risk. This makes aligning perspectives on the current situation and a future vision, a core strategic planning task, incredibly challenging. 

How do you chart a course when your crew is reading entirely different maps, especially when factions band together with like-minded colleagues to challenge other like-minded identity groups? And what do you do when your employees (or customers) want the company to take a stand and make public its commitment to one side or the other in a public debate?

Photo By: Kaboompics.com 

Leading A Company In The Public Eye

In many ways, on truly divisive issues, taking a public stand on polarizing issues is a no-win game. Yet when there is strong alignment between the leadership and the employee base on what is fair and what is in service of the company’s values, it can be the right thing to do.

The best leaders don’t take a strong position on this at first. They focus their energy on managing a polarized workforce by assessing and helping create alignment between all the interested parties: employees, customers, investors, and leaders. If a strong consensus emerges, the best leaders honor that and move to a public stance that serves it, even if their personal beliefs are not completely aligned. The business reason to do this is to use the consensus on the public issues to bring the various stakeholder groups together, building ties.

If a strong consensus does not emerge, despite their own beliefs, leaders are better off helping the various interest groups understand that a public statement will create greater divisions and should be avoided until such a consensus exists. 

When leaders are open and fair in the consensus-building process, even if their own opinions are not the ones the company voices support for, they can draw stakeholders together and strengthen relationships that serve the business.

The Leader’s Tightrope: Authenticity vs. Alienation

This brings us to the heart of the matter: your role as a leader. You have your own values, your own perspective on the issues dividing others, shaped by your experiences and values. How do you lead authentically, staying true to yourself, without alienating colleagues whose views may starkly contrast with yours as you move through decision-making processes like the one described above? For women leaders, this often adds another layer of complexity to leadership – the pressure to maintain harmony can feel intense, sometimes conflicting with the need to take a clear stance.

Abandoning your principles isn’t the answer; that erodes trust and your own leadership foundation. And you don’t have to abandon your beliefs even if they differ from the majority of stakeholders. This is where “agreeing to disagree” can allow you to differ on polarizing issues but align on the fact that the business and its stakeholders can find common ground. This common ground may be an agreement not to agree and focus instead on the health of the business and other consensus issues. Simply broadcasting your personal views, or pushing back against a broader consensus, isn’t effective leadership; it can deepen divides and shut down collaboration far beyond the polarizing issues themselves. The healthier path lies in shifting your mindset and honing specific communication strategies.

Mindset Shift: Focus On Aligning On Shared Purpose, Not Personal Beliefs

The crucial mental shift needed to navigate these choppy waters is moving from trying to reconcile personal worldviews to aligning teams around shared professional objectives. Your role as leader isn’t to convert anyone to your political or cultural viewpoint. It’s to create an environment where diverse individuals can collaborate effectively to achieve business goals. This means gaining alignment, not agreement, which is the core skill in developing consensus. The practical approach to consensus-building, stakeholder enrollment, and productive disagreements are to bring people along to the point they can all “live with” the outcome and work together to achieve it. Absolute agreement isn’t necessary for this pragmatic approach. Below are some specific ways to go about achieving this in a polarized environment.

Practical Strategies for Navigating the Divide

Managing a polarized workforce effectively in this climate requires intentional communication and clear boundaries:

  1. Let Go of the Need to be Right: It’s very human to want to engage in conversions on things you feel strongly about and influence others’ opinions. However, in the business context if you do that, you will create issues for the business and impede your business goals. If you accept that the best outcome is to build stronger business and personal ties, and not to “be right” and convince others to agree with you, you will be able to navigate these issues. If this is hard, look for more of this “being right” opportunity in your personal life, not in your business life.
  2. Establish and Uphold Ground Rules: Explicitly define expectations for respectful discourse focused on work-related topics. This isn’t about censorship, but about creating a psychologically safe container for professional collaboration. Reiterate that personal attacks or disrespectful behavior are unacceptable.
  3. Frame Discussions Around Work Objectives: Consistently steer conversations back to the business goals, data, and strategic priorities. Ask: “How does this external issue impact our project?” or “Based on our agreed-upon goals, what data do we need to make this decision?” This focuses energy on the collective task.
  4. Listen to Understand, Not to Agree: Practice active listening to grasp the underlying concerns or values driving someone’s position, even if you disagree with the position itself. Acknowledging someone’s perspective (“I hear your concern is about X”) doesn’t equal endorsement, but it builds bridges.
  5. Sort for Agreement: When different perspectives begin to get in the way of the discussion, direct the conversation into sorting out what people agree on vs. what they don’t, and limit the conversation to the issues that affect the business. This can establish a process to find common ground and narrow disagreements, making them potentially more actionable to resolve.
  6. Model the Behavior You Expect: Remain calm, respectful, and focused on the process, even when discussions become tense. Acknowledge complexity and uncertainty where it exists. Your steadiness sets the tone for the entire team.
  7. Know When and How to Intervene (and When Not To): Redirect conversations that veer into unproductive personal debates back to the work. Facilitate structured dialogue methods that separate ideas from identities. Sometimes, the most effective leadership is recognizing which conversations are simply not appropriate or productive for the workplace.

Authenticity Through Action and Values-Based Leadership

So, how do you remain authentic? Authenticity in leadership isn’t about revealing every personal opinion, every thought in your head, or emotion in your heart. It’s about expressing consistency between your stated values as a leader (e.g., fairness, respect, integrity, accountability) and your actions. It’s about transparency in your decision-making process, even if the outcome isn’t universally popular.

Your deeply held principles inform how you lead – how you foster inclusivity, ensure fair processes, hold people accountable to shared standards of conduct, and champion the organization’s stated values. When you must take a stance, root it in these shared organizational or leadership values, not solely in personal ideology. This builds trust based on your leadership actions, not agreement with your private beliefs.

Of course, part of staying true to your values and beliefs may mean taking a stand for them when you believe you must. The best way to do this is without anger and with a focus on defining success as being heard, not agreed with. No one has a “right” – or is entitled – to be agreed with. If you don’t feel able to do this in a way that makes you feel respected or comfortable in your work environment, it may be time to look for employment in a company where there are more shared values between you, the employees, and the stakeholders. 

Leading Forward

Leading a polarized workforce is a demanding yet essential skill for modern leaders. It requires moving beyond the desire for easy consensus to master the art of facilitating productive collaboration amidst disagreement. By focusing on shared work objectives, establishing clear communication protocols, modeling respectful engagement, and grounding your authenticity in consistent leadership actions, you can navigate these challenging dynamics effectively. This isn’t just about keeping the peace; it’s about ensuring your team and your organization can achieve their goals, even when the world outside feels fractured. Developing this capacity is crucial for any leader, and will pay dividends in ways that reach far beyond managing a polarized workforce.

Ready to invest in yourself?

FREE Executive Coaching consultation with Dana Theus

Why Crazy Attracts Crazy

Key Takeaways:

  • Life tends to magnetize the energy we emit, so if your mind is spinning in “crazy” territory—frenzied, anxious, or chaotic—you can expect more of the same to show up in your life.

  • Reality-TV drama teaches us something real: drama is not a natural magnet—casting directors chase outlandish “crazy” because it guarantees conflict, and the same applies in our lives when we don’t manage our energy.

  • The experiences, people, and situations we attract mirror our internal state—because calm, strong, confident thoughts broadcast higher-energy outcomes, while insecure, scattered ones call in chaos.

  • The antidote isn’t more distraction—it’s consciously choosing high‑level thoughts; shift your mental posture to that of clarity and strength, and the external will follow.

  • You are a magnet—literally. The key question: What kind of energy are you radiating, and what are you inviting in? Start with your internal world to change your external one.

I don’t watch much TV but when I do it’s usually crap.

And by crap, I mean reality shows.

For example, despite my best effort, last night I got sucked into an episode of Couples Therapy on VH1.

Assuming you’re not in the .00000001% of the population who has actually seen it, the show is about “celebrities” who agree to be counseled in Hail-Mary attempts to save their relationship.

Cue the drama.

Now…it’s easy to think made-for-TV drama comes by putting people in uncomfortable situations (like having therapy sessions aired nationally), but that’s not always true. Fully-functioning, normal human beings are terrible for these shows and casting directors know it.

So they look for crazy.

Because casting directors know that crazy attracts crazy and – ta da! – that’s good TV.

And on some level we’ve seen this in our own lives.

I mean, we may not be hanging out with Flavor Flav, but we all have friends or family who are always steeped in trouble.

And we allllll have coworkers who are always steeped in crisis, right?

Maybe you even recognize a drama-zone around yourself.

If so, let me be perfectly honest with you for a moment.

This is game-changing so come closer.

…..Closer……

…..Clooooooser……

The truth is, you’re calling it in m’dear.

Yes. I’m serious.

The people, situations, and things that come IN to your life reflect the very same energy you put OUT into the world.

What this means is that if your mind is in a calm, strong, and confident place, your energy will be high-level – and so your experiences will be high-level. But the inverse is also true. If your mind is in a frenzied, insecure, and crazy place, your energy will be low-level – and so your experiences will be low-level.

It’s critical to understand this – particularly if you’re trying to cultivate a leadership presence at work – and so here we come full-circle to where we always begin and end with my stuff:

If you want to change the nature of your experience, change the nature of your thoughts. CHOOSE to think high-level thoughts so you can attract high-level things.

Remember: You are a magnet.

The question is, of what?

Post originally on emilybennington.com

Ready to invest in yourself?

FREE Executive Coaching consultation with Dana Theus

Captain Obvious Gets A Lesson in Empathy

Key Takeaways:

  • Empathy — Recognizing that stating the obvious might sting, Mary models curiosity and care over critique, inviting us to see what’s really behind someone’s choice before we comment.

  • She reminds us that pointing out what everyone “should do” can feel like a personal attack, even when well‑meaning, and can lead people to mask their real reasons—like limited resources or internal politics—rather than own them.

  • Declaring what seems obvious may unintentionally suggest incompetence, creating defensiveness instead of connection, because perception is often more powerful than fact.

  • Mary reframes the act of stating the obvious into something collaborative, using tentatively phrased questions and empathic framing like, “I’m sure you already thought about this, but…” to keep the dialogue open and safe.

  • A pause and a shift in tone matters: by slowing down and stepping into another’s perspective—literally walking in their shoes—you transform a pointed suggestion into a co‑creative conversation that builds bridges.

There have been a number of projects where I observed a client not following industry best practices. It was weird. The client company had many smart employees, so for them not to follow best practices, to not do what was obvious, seemed strange. Why not do what every other company does?

I learned the hard way that stating the obvious, asking why they didn’t follow best practices, was never well received. Sometimes my suggestion would be interpreted as a snide remark about their work, or worse, perceived as a personal attack, accusing someone of not understanding their field.

Over time, I realized that there were 3 main reasons why stating the obvious directly to my client was a faux pas.

    1. It was embarrassing for my client to admit the real reason why best practices weren’t being leveraged. I learned that many of these businesses had either a business/resource or political reason. For either situation, if I was too direct in my communications, the client tried to mask the real reason why best practices weren’t being followed. Who wants to admit that they don’t have the funding to do something properly? Or that a VP doesn’t like the best practice for some silly reason? By directly suggesting that they implement a best practice, I was calling them out on a “failure.” In a way, I was demanding them to explain themselves and share their dirty little secrets. And no one likes to admit to secrets.
    2. I implied that the client is inept. Telling someone the obvious could imply that you don’t believe he knows what the best practices are. In a way, you are indirectly criticizing that person’s job performance. This could lead to that person thinking you don’t trust him or her to do their job, or worse, you believe that he isn’t qualified. Although that may not be true, perception is reality, so what the client perceived as true, was true. I could do nothing to change his mind. I decided it would be better not to set that message in someone’s head.
    3. I was perceived as one who searched for problems. Stating the obvious and pointing out weaknesses or defects was often interpreted as a way for me to get business. I may have been right, but I was seen as a troublemaker, looking for problems to fix. And the client didn’t want to hear about one more problem on their side anyway.

So how did I change my communication approach so I could do the work I needed to do?

I practiced empathy in my communications

Before I shared my perspective with a client, I would take a beat and ask myself if I was going to be stating the obvious. If that were true, I would then ask myself “why is this client not doing what’s obvious? There must be a reason.”

I’d put myself into my client’s shoes and try to imagine why they did something differently. I’d ask myself questions like:

  • He seems smart – why would he not use industry standards?
  • Maybe they aren’t aware of them and what’s current?
  • Are they doing it and I just don’t know about it?
  • Maybe they don’t have the resources to do this properly?
  • Maybe their superiors don’t want to do it?
  • Maybe there is something else going on? What am I missing here?

This process would get me to reframe the conversation. Rather than telling someone he should be following best practices, which he already knows, I would shift the conversation to find out why it’s not being done. I’d turn it from being an inquisition to a discussion about the best way to work.

Strategies for engaging with empathy

I’d ask questions rather than make statements, using starters like:

  • I was wondering if you have thought of….
  • Did you consider….

 Sometimes I’d be direct:

  • This may sound like an obvious solution, but I didn’t know if…

I’d include complements with the suggestion, especially with clients who seemed on top of things:

  • I’m sure it has come up that [item here] would be valuable and I know you’ve probably got this and have a plan in place

I would note that it may be something that someone already considered.

  • I’m sure you already thought about this, but what about…
  • I have an idea I wanted to run past you…
  • I’m not sure if you tried this in the past….

I’d often blame myself if I brought up details in discussions where we weren’t there yet.

  • I know this sounds nit picky, but I found…
  • I know it’s early in the process, but some feedback

Acknowledge when people are busy and haven’t had a chance to address an issue. Don’t demand it to be addressed today, but be clear in your communication that you believe that your client’s “got this.”

  • I know you have a lot on your plate, but I’m sure you are considering these other solutions too….

We all want to be helpful, but at the same time, we need to communicate to others so that they will be open to our suggestions. We may think that stating the obvious will help someone because we are assuming that the person never considered that recommendation. That may be true, but don’t assume that’s the case. Most people have probably considered what you are recommending, especially obvious best practices.

Empathy can be the key to have more productive conversations. Empathy can shift a conversation from being an order – “follow this best practice” – to a collaborative discussion about why an organization decided to do something differently. Through empathy’s nature, it fosters understanding, bringing people together. Taking a beat or two to reframe a thought to have an empathetic tone can make all the difference.

Authentic Feminine Leadership

 Reimagine feminine success

FREE NEWSLETTER
unlock your authentic relationship with power

Is The Era Of Servant Leadership Over?

This is an adaptation of a post I made on servant leadership on my InPower Women Substack last week, revised for a general audience. That post includes a subscriber-only exercise to help identify ways we can each personally offer authentic leadership, and support good leaders, during this time of leadership crisis. On the same theme, in my InPower Women LinkedIn newsletter this month I offer advice for leaders who are committed to continue supporting diversity and inclusion efforts.

Key Takeaways

  1. The Illusion of Meritocracy: Below, I unpack why the concept of “meritocracy,” often touted as the ideal, can actually perpetuate inequality, and how focusing on “culture fit” can mask underlying biases.
  2. Servant Leadership Under Scrutiny: I explore my personal journey as my understanding of servant leadership is challenged by current political and social dynamics, and how privilege shapes our perception of who is being served.
  3. The Vulnerability of “Othered” Groups: I drill down on how the dismantling of DEI initiatives and the rise of “strongman” values create a sense of expendability for underrepresented groups, and why this should concern everyone.
  4. True Leadership Serves the Whole: I recenter myself–and you!–on why effective leadership requires serving the entire organization and all its stakeholders, not just a select few, and what happens when leaders fail to do so, leading to systemic failure and distrust.

I didn’t intend to brush up against politics in this month’s writings, but it seems to have bumped up against me. Reading my feeds and talking to many clients and readers over the last few weeks, it seems that the leadership “industry” is in a bit of a crisis right now, thanks to what passes for leadership we see from our current leaders in America. Many leaders and leadership thinkers are struggling with a quandary. What happens when leaders turn their back those they lead? Who has an appetite for character-based or servant leadership when all we see in the news is an obsession with “winning,” efficiency to the detriment of serving those who struggle to serve themselves, and the reshaping of alliances around “strongman” values instead of long-term success, safety and security? 

This hit home for me in the form of a big part of my professional identity, which is to be a servant leader. Servant leadership invert the traditional power structure of leader-first, defaulting to servant-first thinking. They believe that when people are cared for–especially employees–both the people and the organization will thrive. What we see running our country right now is not servant leadership. Too many people do not feel cared for.

That said, exploration of this brought me up short and gave me a lot to think about when it comes to “who” it is a leader must care for to be a servant. 

My biases

I’m particularly sensitive to the populations of underrepresented leaders and vulnerable youth being targeted very overtly by the leaders in the US government right now. 

Biased behavior we’ve been talking about as unconscious bias for years is now very conscious today, as every reference to “DEI” (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) is erased, questioned, and shut down

All the progress towards giving a fair shot to competent women, people of every color, people of every gender, and the differently-abled is being intentionally dismantled. It’s happening in the government and in corporations alike, making prejudicial hiring and promotions perfectly acceptable in large swaths of society. Additionally, needed forms of support are being cut off for entire categories of people merely because of their race, gender, and other characteristics, which are both out of their control and largely irrelevant to their ability.

Why do I think it’s bias showing itself in our leaders? Because if they merely felt the system needed corrections and balancing, they wouldn’t shut it down so completely. Or they would replace it with a system designed to achieve the goals of balance and correction. At least competent leaders would. They would understand that a total shut down gives permission to people to live their prejudices out loud, even if it hurts others.

It appears to me that the well-being of the people DEI supported is being very overtly overlooked in favor of optimizing organizations to the leaders’ ideals, regardless of the cost to the people in need of support and protection. And people–even people not supported by DEI–are being hurt as government and contractor job losses mount and benefit streams dry up around the world. 

It’s making me sit with the questions: What happens when the people in power do not act as though they care for us? Does this mean that what I was taught about good leadership—what I teach about good leadership—is it all just a myth? That Machiavelli was right and the ends do justify the means–“winning?” 

In puzzling over these questions, I’ve refined my thinking about servant leadership and leadership in general. I’ve come to a deeper understanding of privilege. 

Before I could get to my learnings, however, I had to let go of some idealistic thinking. I had to grieve a lot of misunderstanding and truth in favor of the realities of the day. Here are some of my ah-ha’s in this process.

Grieving meritocracy

The irony of the anti-DEI actions mentioned above is that the White House says it’s shutting things down to ensure the government is a meritocracy, a term coined from a satire written in 1958. Did you catch that? A satire. The idea of a meritocracy we all seek, where our effort and work quality open doors that would otherwise remain closed, originated in a satiric work. 

As researcher Emilio J. Castilla at the MIT Sloan School of Management found in conducting recent research on “merit-based” workplaces, a leadership focus on “meritocracy” often suppresses a meritocratic environment: “Certain gender, racial, and other demographic disparities might persist in today’s organizations not only despite management’s attempts to reduce them but also because of such efforts.” 

In reality, Castilla and others have found that a focus on merit is too often used as an excuse to lean into reinforcement of the dominant culture. Such “merit-based” cultures tend to see “merit” in those who reinforce the culture regardless of their ability, experience, or results. This is why you want to be wary of hiring practices that emphasize “culture fit” as a primary criterion. Your good work is less likely to shine there if you don’t personally fit the cultural stereotypes they’re hiring for.

Most under-represented leaders would not find this surprising. Many women, racial minorities, LGBTQIA, neurodivergent, and differently-abled people have experienced such anti-meritocratic workplace standards in ways a majority of white males have not. Sadly, working twice as hard or twice as well–strong measures of a true meritocracy– is simply not the way to succeed by itself.

As with unconscious bias, even the veneer of truly merit-based practices is now on the outs in our government (along with many highly qualified leaders).

This makes me sad. I want to believe that powerful leaders can see past cultural stereotypes to achieve results while rewarding good work and elevating people based on true merit and potential. I want to believe that how we win is at least as important as what and why we win. I still want to believe that the vision of character-based and servant leadership I grew up to admire is the right way to lead.

As the Trump Administration tries to undo decades of progress towards a more equal and equitable society, many non-white-male people are feeling seen for who they’re demonized to be, rather than seen for who they actually are. 

Leaders who care about people would never do this.

But a majority of voters chose this. Does that mean they–we–don’t need or want to be cared for? 

Service As Privilege

Looking at our daily headlines through a servant leader’s lens has been hard. It feels like a rejection of all the values I care about. We chose leaders more interested in acting like strongmen than stewarding public resources for public good, and who appear to serve no one but themselves. Sitting with this realization last week, however, it hit me.

All leaders serve somebody.

Even our current leaders, in serving themselves, are also serving others who agree with them. Our past leaders certainly served themselves at the same time they served those under-represented groups of people who are now losing their protections. Today’s leaders claim that the people they serve have been underserved by those who have been in power in the past. Could they, also, be servant leaders–but of different people? In a different way?

When I was coming of age in the business world, those espousing servant leader values made me feel cared for. 

I realize now my trust in character-based servant leadership was a sign of my privilege as a white woman of more-than-modest means in the years after the second wave of feminism began to secure women’s rights in the workplace and society. In those innocent-for-me times, many in our communities were still “othered” (often by feminists!) and endured a lack of protection before they secured civil, sexual, and gender identity rights. Back then, they did not feel served by the servant leaders who I felt served me. I felt protected, but they didn’t. Today, in the moment, as protection for my class of people (i.e., women) is washed aside with the expulsion of all things DEI, I feel unprotected. And I am just as vulnerable as those who’d been othered before me. 

This quote is finally catching up to me:

First, they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

—Martin Niemöller

To be fair to myself, I do speak out and stand for my values, but on the topics of leadership, I have stayed out of political discourse. Being othered now, like so many before me, I now feel expendable to whatever gets in the way of our new leaders’ efforts to serve those they deem worthy of protection, and I’m feeling more like these insights belong in my leadership writing and thinking as well.

Here’s my leadership insight from these last months of headline onslaught: I believe I have found the chink in the armor of servant-based leadership, which is that when only some people are served, everyone does not feel protected. Instead, they feel vulnerable. 

I see that my faith in servant leadership once upon a time was possible because I was privileged enough to count myself as part of the group served, but now that I’m on the outs, I find myself sharing in the growing distrust in our institutions as our political parties swap the subgroups of people they serve back and forth, playing with people’s lives in the process.

If any leader is only serving themselves or a small subset of people, they risk failing at their primary purpose, to make effective change possible by improving the lives of everyone they touch. Clearly, our previous leaders in government failed to do this, making too many voters feel underserved and unprotected. And our new leaders are well on their way to doing the same. 

It’s not enough for a leader to serve a subset* of the system, to achieve outcomes that only benefit some of its stakeholders. They must serve the entire system, giving all its stakeholders enough value to meet their needs, if not all their wants. 

If it doesn’t, the system will fail, as will our new leaders.

*To be fair, in a practical and business context, it is fair for leaders to carve out market segments (i.e., subsets of the system) to focus on. However, my insight here on the limitations of servant leadership is that even around those subsegments, they should define their audiences broadly to include all stakeholders who are affected by their actions.

Photo by cotton-bro studio

FREE PDF
Guide to Women in Leadership

Executive Coach Dana Theus shares her tried and true strategies to help women excel in higher levels of leadership and achieve their executive potential.

Confessions of a Reluctant Feminist: My Role In Perpetuating Workplace Discrimination

Key Takeaways:

  • Workplace discrimination is a mirror, not a point of blame—when we acknowledge our own contributions to the everyday dynamics, we open a curious, compassionate pathway to change.


  • It takes bravery to notice the moments when we default to the systemic script—whether it’s staying silent, not challenging a microaggression, or unconsciously reinforcing bias.


  • Being a “reluctant feminist” isn’t about shame—it’s an act of clarity, naming the ways we’ve quietly maintained old norms as a way of protecting ourselves, even when we didn’t believe in them.


  • Admitting our complicity is not surrender—it’s an invitation to co-create a work culture where reflection, vulnerability, and intentional shifts matter more than perfection.


  • The point isn’t guilt, it’s growth: leaning into discomfort helps us rewrite our stories—and our collective workplace cultures—to be more inclusive, equitable, and authentically supportive

Note: I wrote this a few years ago, so some of the references are a bit dated, however the content and thinking process was importnat to document. I’ve continued to evolve my thinking in multiple directions, and return to this post to ground me in the beginnings of my explorations. Most of my thinking on these topics is being explored more actively on my InPower Women Substack these days, if you’re interested in following me there.

The lack of workforce diversity affects virtually every business. We need to figure out how to fight the kind of workplace discrimination that creates cultural uniformity in our businesses for two reasons. First, it’s the right thing to do; when more of our workplaces become safe havens for diverse people and cultures, our broader society will benefit. As the Harvey Weinstein debacle has shown us, those who are willing to abuse their power at work perpetuate a broader culture of fear and inequity that ripples through entire industries. Second, as has been shown consistently in research, a truly diverse workforce has riches and returns to offer its shareholders, customers and employees. The bottom line is that solving the workplace diversity problem is good for people and business.

I did not always perceive the challenges of diversity this clearly. In fact, for a long time I didn’t really perceive them at all. It’s become clear to me only recently, that even learning to see them isn’t enough to change them. We have to learn to see discrimination and speak about it in very specific ways to keep from perpetuating it.

Learning to See Workplace Discrimination

I’ve always approached the subject of workplace diversity from a gender perspective, even if a bit reluctantly, and I believe my experience highlights many of the challenges in creating a diverse workforce.

First of all, it’s clear to me in hindsight that I wasn’t able to see through the lens of race because in the decades of my middle management career, I’ve literally never worked with people of color, above, below or beside me. In government affairs, telecom, software and internet businesses where I came of working age, I don’t recall having any black colleagues on the marketing or business side of the house, though we did have a few Asian people in finance. On the tech side of the house, Indian and Asian gentlemen were more common, but not in leadership. Women in tech and leadership were nonexistent, and I can only remember one out-of-the-closet gay man I worked alongside for three months.

Secrets to a diverse workplace: stop looking outside yourself for the answer.Click To Tweet

Thus my personal experience of distinctions in workplace culture was through the lens of gender. Believing what my bosses told me early in my career, that I worked in an egalitarian meritocracy, I didn’t really look for gender discrimination in the workplace. I wanted to believe the story I was told, that being a woman wouldn’t affect my career. After a decade or so, this perspective was more challenging, as it became clear to me that my gender did impact the professional choices  and challenges before me. I got tired of working twice as hard for the opportunity to wield less power and influence. I began to value my family life more deeply as my children grew and I saw my 50+ hour a week job as a counterforce to the balanced life I wanted. I sought a better, more self-directed way, and thanks to the strength of my intentions, I found one.

I didn’t experience my personal journey as “discrimination” when I was traveling its road, but in the last decade, coaching other women, I’ve learned to see some of my own experiences — “trivial” things like being talked over in meetings, and “significant” events such as being excluded from major decisions about my team that were made on the 18th hole — as discriminatory and unfair in ways that eluded me earlier. Listening to others, I also remembered overly personal comments in elevators that had made me feel uncomfortable and unwilling to seek mentoring relationships with powerful men. Once I learned to see these things I used to let slide (or make excuses for), they became clearer acts of bias, preference or outright aggression.

With the benefits of hindsight, I see that I didn’t really have a name for these subtle experiences and thus it’s not surprising that I found them challenging to talk about clearly, even with my female clients. “Discrimination” has a fairly clear legal meaning and many of the things that had happened to me and other women I knew weren’t legally clear. My experiences were ambiguous at best, upsetting at worst, and everyone (including me!) has become practiced at ignoring them or explaining them away as “just the way things are” and “probably just your imagination.” When people tell you that you’re imagining things, you begin to doubt your own experience. I’ve struggled alongside my female clients to try to give voice to the cultural dynamics that keep women out of positions of leadership and influence.

In the recent news about racism, however, I’m finding some useful vocabulary.

With the re-emergence of public discussions about sexism and racism in the news today, words such as “bystander” and “microaggression” give us ways to talk about some of the things that happened to me (and people I know) in the workplace years ago. I’m discovering that, in ways that matter, many of the interpersonal dynamics of misogyny and sexism are identical to those of racism.

This realization is spurring yet another evolution for me regarding workplace discrimination that I’d like to share, in the hopes I can bring you along on my journey to understanding the dynamics of a diverse workforce at a deeper level.

A Personal Confession About Racial Discrimination

While developing a platform to help empower women over the last few years, I’ve struggled with how to support those working alongside me who are standing up against racism, ageism and other forms of discrimination. In particular, I’ve empathized deeply with my black friends as the data about police violence against their brothers and sons has become impossible to ignore. In my public postings, however, on this blog and social media, I always found myself hesitant to click “share” when racial issues are explored. My brain ran with concerns about muddying my personal brand, because I’ve chosen to stand for gender equity rather than a more broad definition of equality.

I hated that I wasn’t comfortable standing with people of color publicly, but I rationalized that I was doing more good focusing on the issue I felt passion about, and about which I have personal experience. Since I require myself to have authentic personal connections to every cause on which I engage, I just couldn’t find my way to an authentic connection with the issues that people of color struggled against.

However, something in me shifted in the conversations after the summer 2017 events in Charlottesville. As I began to look more deeply into the dynamics of racism and research how to be a white ally, I began to see that in ways that matter, many interpersonal interactions that underlie racism are actually identical to the dynamics of misogyny and sexism, against which I’ve taken a clear stand. As I was in the midst of discovering this I participated in a few business workshops where I saw these same dynamics playing out between colleagues in person, across all divides — racial, ethnic and gender. In a conversation after one of the workshops, a young Asian gentleman called me out on my own willingness to lump people (i.e., men) into a bucket unfairly, and suddenly the link between all these forms of discrimination became clearer.

The Secret That Eluded Me: I’m Part of the Problem

As my ah-ha sunk in, the first thing that struck me was perhaps the most important, the most obvious and the most personally disturbing: I was a much bigger part of the problem than I had ever realized, or been willing to admit. It opened me up to deeper questions about my own role in creating corporate culture. I don’t feel that racism or sexism that have come down through history is my fault, or that I am to blame for my black friends’ plight or my own bumps against the glass ceiling, but perhaps I have been complicit in supporting the cultural heritage that made both these things possible in ways I don’t understand? I don’t feel responsible for the sexism that cost my mother her political career, or my great great grandfather’s profit from human bondage, but do I play a role in perpetuating sexist and racist business cultures today? I honestly don’t fully understand the answer to these questions, and as of this writing, I’m deep into these questions.

But here’s what I do understand and want to share, because I think it’s true for almost all of us, white, black, Latino/a, man, woman, African, Asian, European, gay, bi, transexual and any other version of human you identify with: I have been misconstruing the problem in such a way that I can’t possibly be as constructive a part of the solution as I was trying to be.

The problem is not that people have biases, conscious and unconscious, or that people act on them, because we all do. That’s the bottom line of unconscious bias research. The problem is that we don’t know how to talk about these biases in ways that help everyone see them, and explore them in ways that give people room to evolve their biases. The problem is that culturally we don’t know how to address these issues without generating fear and shame on all sides.

Without a space where everyone feels safe, we’ll never find a solution.

And this is where my contribution has probably been strongest. By not learning to see gender, racial and other biases and discrimination clearly in the moment when it happens, by not learning to talk about it in that moment without shaming anyone present, I’ve been a bystander. As a bystander, I’ve inadvertently enabled those who perpetuate discrimination, consciously and unconsciously, to believe it was okay.

And it’s not okay.

Being clearer on the problem, now, I’m going to commit to figuring out how to become part of the solution, to create safe spaces and learn the vocabulary of microagression and microempowerment. I want to discover ways to give people permission to see it and choose what they want to do about it. This is much harder than it looks because the line between microaggression and microempowerment is not only thin, but quite frequently out of our control. Even in a safe environment, it’s a very challenging thing to address.

Look for future posts on the dynamics of bystanderism and microaggression as I explore this. Feel free to share your experiences to help me. If I can figure out how to see and understand these issues, I can do a better job of speaking up in constructive ways. And maybe if I get really good at it, I can bring you along with me. Stay tuned.

Check out our free coaching resources!” and make free coaching resources!

FREE PDF
Guide to Women in Leadership

Executive Coach Dana Theus shares her tried and true strategies to help women excel in higher levels of leadership and achieve their executive potential.

Women’s Equality: Blame Won’t Get Us There

Key Takeaways:

  • Equality can’t thrive in a culture of blame; shifting from fault-finding to shared responsibility creates space for growth and understanding.

  • Equality is more complex than just fixing individual bias—it lives in the intersection of beliefs, systems, behaviors, and culture, and must be addressed holistically.

  • Male engagement is essential for true equality; when men withdraw out of fear or discomfort, opportunities for learning and connection are lost.

  • Asking better questions—about how we treat, promote, and perceive each other—moves us closer to equality by challenging assumptions and opening minds.

  • Lasting equality depends on collective curiosity and courage, not finger-pointing; it invites all of us into the work of changing how power and opportunity are distributed.

Have you ever heard of Women’s Equality Day? It’s August 26th. I’m glad that this day exists. It commemorates the game-changing moment, 95 years ago today, when women gained the constitutional right to vote in the US.  It’s important to celebrate that and to remember that there are still many women in the world without a political voice.

But I’m also sad that there’s a Women’s Equality Day, because it confirms that true gender equality still eludes us. Whether it’s a moral issue or a business issue for you, equality matters. And it’s painful to confront the distance we have yet to travel.

As we connect with our disappointment, it’s tempting to assign blame for why things are the way they are. But in my experience, blame doesn’t get us anywhere we really want. Why? Because it slams shut the possibility for change. While blamers are finding fault, blamees are attacking back or running for cover. Meanwhile, nobody’s learning. And if nobody’s learning, nothing’s changing. As one male client, who cares very much about gender equality, said to me:

I live in fear of saying the wrong thing and being labeled an insensitive jerk. So I disengage; I stay quiet instead of speaking up; I play it safe and keep my distance.

Even this man, a staunch believer in women’s equality, shuts down for fear of incurring the blame blowback of ‘getting it wrong.’ That means that he doesn’t engage, doesn’t grow and doesn’t work for change. And yet research tells us that we need men to engage to make progress.

How do we confront bias against women (and other so-called minority groups) in such a way that opens up mutual understanding, accountability and action? I think we start by changing how we relate to bias itself: not so much as someone’s fault, but rather as a shared phenomenon in which we’re all participating. It’s not that there isn’t fault to find; it’s just that fault-finding doesn’t seem to get us anywhere.

Bias is the result of a convergence of both personal and systemic influences:

  1. individual beliefs and values
  2. individual behavior
  3. culture: collective values, mindsets and patterns of behavior
  4. structures: the policies, laws, physical and organizational structures, media, etc. that we build to carry out what the culture values

These influences interact dynamically, continually affecting and being affected by each other.  After years of history and habit, these influences weave tightly together to form very solid social patterns. Some of us benefit from those social patterns and strive, consciously or unconsciously, to keep them intact. Others of us aren’t well served by the patterns and we rail against them. And as we’re protecting or railing, it’s natural to fault each other for being oppressors or malcontents.

… As if the mud-slinging will help. As if the problem lies only in our personal shortcomings. As if the solution were that one-dimensional.

In the quest for gender equity in organizational life, the questions are larger than “Whose fault is it?” And the stocktaking needs to be done by men and women alike. Based on the four influences above, here are some questions that we can engage in together to examine and shift the complicated phenomenon of bias.

Personal beliefs

  • Are there certain behaviors that I tolerate in men that I recoil at in women? Or vice versa? What do those differing reactions tell me about what I deem “OK” and “not OK” from each gender?
  • How does that impact my openness to people as they are?
  • Do I ever expect more or less from women than I do from men? If so, what assumptions are driving the difference in my expectations?

As a result of this inquiry: Which of my beliefs and assumptions most inhibit a fuller openness to women, and how can I start challenging those beliefs?  

Personal actions

  • Are there women that I could or should be advocating for that I don’t? Why don’t I?
  • Have I ever shied away from giving a woman feedback that might have helped her succeed? And if I did give feedback, was it specific and behavioral enough to enable her to take clear action?
  • Who tends to sway my opinions and thinking most often? Is there a gender dimension to who I listen to and don’t?

As a result of this inquiry: What one or two things can I start or stop doing to more actively support the women I live and work with? 

Culture

  •  Are there customs, events or practices in our organization that women don’t seem to attend or fully participate in? Might that indicate that these practices are exclusionary in some way?
  • Do we use language or ways of communicating that might exclude women or make them feel uncomfortable? How would we know?
  • When women have raised concerns about how they’re treated, how quickly or consistently have we taken action to address them? Have we given negative labels to women who have expressed their discontent?
  • Who are the formal leaders and informal power brokers in our organization? If women are sparse there, what might that tell us about the exclusive nature of our culture’s values?

As a result of this inquiry: What one or two of our patterns of collective behavior most work against a level playing field for men and women?  What new patterns do we want to establish?  How will we hold ourselves and each other accountable?  

Structures

  • Do any of our employment, promotion, performance management or development practices make it harder for women than men to excel or advance?
  • Have we established mechanisms to measure whether men and women experience this organization differently?
  • Are more women than men leaving the organization? If so, what do they tell us in their exit interviews? If they say it’s “Too late” to give feedback, what were the signals that we missed along the way?

As a result of this inquiry: Which of our practices and policies seem to create barriers to women’s success? How should we update those practices to support an equality agenda? How do we ensure that our structures are continually updated to reflect our changing cultural values? 

Blame is the quickest way I know to stop the journey toward equality. By looking at bias as a shared phenomenon, rather than as someone’s fault, we can step out of the fray and get curious about our patterns of interaction. Perhaps then we can look at bias together, without finding fault, and martial our collective creativity toward the equality that most of us really want.

FREE PDF
Guide to Women in Leadership

Executive Coach Dana Theus shares her tried and true strategies to help women excel in higher levels of leadership and achieve their executive potential.